Growth Rate and Generation Time of Bacteria, with Special Reference to Continuous Culture

References

1. Bowker A. M. 1948; A test for symmetry in contingency tables. J. Amer. statist. Ass 43:572
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bryson V., Szybalski W. 1952; Microbial selection. Science 116:45
   [Google Scholar]
3. Dagley S., Hinshelwood C. N. 1938; Physico-chemical aspects of bacterial growth.Part I. Dependence of growth of Bact. lactisaerogenes on concentration of medium. J. chem. Soc p. 1930
   [Google Scholar]
4. Feeler W. 1950 Probability Theory and its Applications New York: John Wiley and Sons;
   [Google Scholar]
5. Harris T. E. 1951; Some mathematical models for branching processes. Proc. Second Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability p. 305
   [Google Scholar]
6. Herbert D., Elsworth R., Telling R. C. 1956; The continuous culture of bacteria: a theoretical and experimental study. J. gen. Microbiol 14:601
   [Google Scholar]
7. Hughes W. H. 1955; The inheritance of differences in growth rate in Escherichia coli. J. gen. Microbiol 12:265
   [Google Scholar]
8. Johnson N. L. 1949; Bivariate distributions based on simple translation systems. Biometrika 36:297
   [Google Scholar]
9. Kendall D. G. 1948; On the role of variable generation time in the development of a stochastic birth process. Biometrika 35:316
   [Google Scholar]
10. Kendall D. G. 1952; On the choice of a mathematical model to represent normal bacterial growth. J. R. statist. Soc. B 14:41
    [Google Scholar]
11. Monod J. 1942 Recherches sur la croissance des cultures bactériennes Paris: Hermann et Cie;
    [Google Scholar]
12. Monod J. 1950; La technique de culture continue, théorieet applications. Ann. Inst. Pasteur 79:390
    [Google Scholar]
13. Narumi S. 1923a; On the general forms of bivariate frequency distributions which are mathematically possible when regression and variation are subjected to limiting conditions. Part I. Biometrika 15:77
    [Google Scholar]
14. Narumi S. 1923b; On the general forms of bivariate frequency distributions which are mathematically possible when regression and variation are subjected to limiting conditions. Part II. Biometrika 15:209
    [Google Scholar]
15. Novick A. 1955; Growth of bacteria. Annu. Rev. Microbiol 9:97
    [Google Scholar]
16. Novick A., Szilard L. 1950; Description of the chemostat. Science 112:715
    [Google Scholar]
17. Pearson E. S., Hartley H. O. 1954 Biometrika Tables for Statisticians I Cambridge University Press;
    [Google Scholar]
18. Powell E. O. 1955; Some features of the generation times of individual bacteria. Biometrika 42:16
    [Google Scholar]
19. Powell E. O. 1956a; A rapid method for determining the proportion of viable bacteria in a culture. J. gen. Microbiol 14:153
    [Google Scholar]
20. Powell E. O. 1956b; The pattern of bacterial generation times. Biometrika 43: In the Press
    [Google Scholar]
21. Rahn O. 1932; A chemical explanation of the variability of the growth rate. J. gen. Physiol 15:257
    [Google Scholar]
22. Topley & Wilson’s Principles of Bacteriology and Immunity 1955, 4th edition. Wilson G. S., Miles A. A. ed. by London: Edward Arnold;
23. Whittaker E. T., Watson G. N. 1940 Modern Analysis, 4th ed. Cambridge University Press;
    [Google Scholar]