1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: The absorption of acriflavine by strains of and occurred at approximately the same rate and extent and was greatest in the range pH 4–5. In this range, the proportion of respiration-deficient cells produced by acriflavine treatment was also maximal. Furthermore, under more alkaline conditions, the acriflavine exerted a pronounced toxic effect. At pH 4–5, the proportion of mutant cells produced was about 50 times greater in strains of than in those of , while fewer cells were killed. With the production of mutants was rapid and in certain strains exposure for 1 hr. to 50 g. acriflavine/ml. led to about one-third of the cells mutating, while after 4 hr., all the cells were respiration-deficient. In contrast, exposure of strains of for 24 hr. at this concentration of acriflavine induced only about one-tenth of the cells to mutate. The mutants took up no measurable amount of oxygen when examined in Warburg respirometers. As compared with the parent cultures, there was no difference in the ability of the cells to utilize carbohydrates and to undergo flocculation.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-25-2-191
1961-06-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/25/2/mic-25-2-191.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-25-2-191&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Albert A. 1951 The Acridines London: Arnold;
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Eddy A. A. 1958; Composite nature of the flocculation process of top and bottom strains of Saccharomyces . J. Inst. Brew 64:143
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Ephrussi B. 1953 Nucleo-cytoplasmic Relations in Micro-Organisms; their Bearing on Cell Heredity and Differentiation Oxford: Clarendon Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Ephrussi B., Hottinguer H. 1950; Direct demonstration of the mutagenic action of euflavine on bakers’ yeast. Nature; Lond: 166956
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Ephrussi B., Hottinguer H. 1951; Cytoplasmic constituents of heredity. On an unstable cell state in yeast. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol 16:75
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Gilliland R. B. 1959; Determination of yeast viability. J. Inst. Brew 65:424
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Kilkenny B. C., Hinshelwood C. N. 1951; Utilization of carbon sources by certain yeast strains. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 138:375
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Nagai S. 1959; Induction of respiration deficient mutation in yeast by various synthetic dyes. Science 130:1188
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Nagai S., Nagai H. 1958; A new evidence for induction of respiration deficiency in yeast by acriflavine. Experientia 14:321
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Ogur M., St John R. 1956; A differential and diagnostic plating method for population studies of respiration deficiency in yeast. J. Bact 72:500
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Ogur M., St John R., Nagai S. 1957; Tetrazolium overlay technique for population studies of respiration deficiency in mutant yeasts. Science 125:928
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Ogur M., Lindegren G., Lindegren C. C. 1954; A simple screening test for genetic studies of respiration deficiency in yeast. J. Bact 68:391
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Slonimski P. 1958 In Recent Studies in Yeast and their Significance in Industry. S.C.I. Monograph3 p. 9 London: Society of Chemical Industry;
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Wickerham L. J. 1951; Taxonomy of yeasts. Tech. Bull. U.S. Dep. Agric1029
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-25-2-191
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-25-2-191
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error