1887

Abstract

For the microviruses and the leviviruses, bacteriophages with small single-stranded genomes, host lysis is accomplished by expression of a single gene that encodes an inhibitor of cell wall synthesis. In contrast, phages with double-stranded DNA genomes use a more complex system involving, at minimum, an endolysin, which degrades peptidoglycan, and a holin, which permeabilizes the membrane in a temporally programmed manner. To explore the basis of this difference, a chimera was created in which lysis gene of the microvirus X174 replaced the entire lysis cassette of phage , which includes the holin gene and the endolysin gene . The chimeric phage was viable but more variability was observed both in the distribution of plaque sizes and in the burst sizes of single cells, compared to the isogenic parent. Using different alleles of , it was found the average burst size increased with the duration of the latent period, just as observed with alleles with different lysis times. Moreover, within a set of missense alleles, it was found that variability in lysis timing was limited and almost exclusively derived from changes in the level of E accumulation. By contrast, missense mutations in resulted in a wide variation in lysis times that was not correlated with levels of accumulation. We suggest that the properties of greater phenotypic plasticity and lesser phenotypic variation make the function of holin proteins more genetically malleable, facilitating rapid adaptation towards a lysis time that would be optimal for changed host and environmental conditions. The inferior malleability of single-gene systems like would restrict their occurrence to phages in which coding capacity is the overriding evolutionary constraint.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.2008/016956-0
2008-06-01
2024-04-24
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/154/6/1710.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.2008/016956-0&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Abedon S. T., Hyman P., Thomas C. 2003; Experimental examination of bacteriophage latent-period evolution as a response to bacterial availability. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:7499–7506
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bernhardt T. G., Roof W. D., Young R. 2000; Genetic evidence that the bacteriophage φ X174 lysis protein inhibits cell wall synthesis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 97:4297–4302
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bernhardt T. G., Struck D. K., Young R. 2001a; The lysis protein E of φ X174 is a specific inhibitor of the MraY-catalyzed step in peptidoglycan synthesis. J Biol Chem 276:6093–6097
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Bernhardt T. G., Wang I. N., Struck D. K., Young R. 2001b; A protein antibiotic in the phage Q β virion: diversity in lysis targets. Science 292:2326–2329
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Bernhardt T. G., Roof W. D., Young R. 2002a; The Escherichia coli FKBP-type PPIase SlyD is required for the stabilization of the E lysis protein of bacteriophage φ X174. Mol Microbiol 45:99–108
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Bernhardt T. G., Wang I. N., Struck D. K., Young R. 2002b; Breaking free: “protein antibiotics” and phage lysis. Res Microbiol 153:493–501
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Bläsi U., Fraisl P., Chang C.-Y., Zhang N., Young R. 1999; The C-terminal sequence of the lambda holin constitutes a cytoplasmic regulatory domain. J Bacteriol 181:2922–2929
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Bull J. J., Pfennig D. W., Wang I. N. 2004; Genetic details, optimization and phage life histories. Trends Ecol Evol 19:76–82
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Gründling A., Bläsi U., Young R. 2000a; Biochemical and genetic evidence for three transmembrane domains in the class I holin, λ S. J Biol Chem 275:769–776
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Gründling A., Smith D. L., Bläsi U., Young R. 2000b; Dimerization between the holin and holin inhibitor of phage lambda. J Bacteriol 182:6075–6081
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Gründling A., Manson M. D., Young R. 2001; Holins kill without warning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 98:9348–9352
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Johnson-Boaz R., Chang C.-Y., Young R. 1994; A dominant mutation in the bacteriophage lambda S gene causes premature lysis and an absolute defective plating phenotype. Mol Microbiol 13:495–504
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Kolisnychenko V., Plunkett G. III, Herring C. D., Feher T., Posfai J., Blattner F. R., Posfai G. 2002; Engineering a reduced Escherichia coli genome. Genome Res 12:640–647
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Park T., Struck D. K., Deaton J. F., Young R. 2006; Topological dynamics of holins in programmed bacterial lysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:19713–19718
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Park T., Struck D. K., Dankenbring C. A., Young R. 2007; The pinholin of lambdoid phage 21: control of lysis by membrane depolarization. J Bacteriol 189:9135–9139
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Powell B. S., Rivas M. P., Court D. L., Nakamura Y., Turnbough C. L. Jr 1994; Rapid confirmation of single copy lambda prophage integration by PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 22:5765–5766
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Raab R., Neal G., Sohaskey C., Smith J., Young R. 1988; Dominance in lambda S mutations and evidence for translational control. J Mol Biol 199:95–105
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Ramanculov E. R., Young R. 2001; Genetic analysis of the T4 holin: timing and topology. Gene 265:25–36
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Reader R. W., Siminovitch L. 1971; Lysis defective mutants of bacteriophage lambda: genetics and physiology of S cistron mutants. Virology 43:607–622
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Rydman P. S., Bamford D. H. 2003; Identification and mutational analysis of bacteriophage PRD1 holin protein P35. J Bacteriol 185:3795–3803
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Smith D. L., Struck D. K., Scholtz J. M., Young R. 1998; Purification and biochemical characterization of the lambda holin. J Bacteriol 180:2531–2540
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Summer E. J., Berry J., Tran T. A., Niu L., Struck D. K., Young R. 2007; Rz / Rz1 lysis gene equivalents in Gram-negative bacteria. J Mol Biol 373:1098–1112
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Tran T. A. T., Struck D. K., Young R. 2005; The role of holin and antiholin periplasmic domains in T4 lysis inhibition. J Bacteriol 187:6631–6640
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Wang I. N. 2006; Lysis timing and bacteriophage fitness. Genetics 172:17–26
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Wang I. N., Dykhuizen D. E., Slobodkin L. B. 1996; The evolution of phage lysis timing. Evol Ecol 10:545–558
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Wang I. N., Smith D. L., Young R. 2000; Holins: the protein clocks of bacteriophage infections. Annu Rev Microbiol 54:799–825
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Witte A., Bläsi U., Halfmann G., Szostak M., Wanner G., Lubitz W. 1990a; φ X174 protein E-mediated lysis of Escherichia coli . Biochimie 72:191–200
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Witte A., Wanner G., Bläsi U., Halfmann G., Szostak M., Lubitz W. 1990b; Endogenous transmembrane tunnel formation mediated by φ X174 lysis protein E. J Bacteriol 172:4109–4114
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Witte A., Schrot G., Schon P., Lubitz W. 1997; Proline 21, a residue within the alpha helical domain of φ X174 lysis protein E, is required for its function in Escherichia coli . Mol Microbiol 26:337–346
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Xu M., Struck D. K., Deaton J., Wang I. N., Young R. 2004; The signal arrest-release (SAR) sequence mediates export and control of the phage P1 endolysin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101:6415–6420
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Xu M., Arulandu A., Struck D. K., Swanson S., Sacchettini J. C., Young R. 2005; Disulfide isomerization after membrane release of its SAR domain activates P1 lysozyme. Science 307:113–117
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Young R., Wang I. N. 2006; Phage lysis. In The Bacteriophages , 2nd edn. pp 104–126 Edited by Calendar R. Oxford: Oxford University Press;
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Young R., Wang I. N., Roof W. D. 2000; Phages will out: strategies of host cell lysis. Trends Microbiol 8:120–128
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.2008/016956-0
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.2008/016956-0
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error