Translational selection is operative for synonymous codon usage in Clostridium perfringens and Clostridium acetobutylicum

References

1. Akashi H., Eyre-Walker A. 1998; Translational selection and molecular evolution. Curr Opin Genet Dev 8:688–693
   [Google Scholar]
2. Altschul S. F., Madden T. L., Schaffer A. A., Zhang J., Zhang Z., Miller W., Lipman D. J. 1997; Gapped blast and psi-blast: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389–3402
   [Google Scholar]
3. Bernardi G., Bernardi G. 1986; Compositional constraints and genome evolution. J Mol Evol 24:1–11
   [Google Scholar]
4. Bulmer M. 1991; The selection-mutation-drift theory of synonymous codon usage. Genetics 129:897–907
   [Google Scholar]
5. de Miranda A. B., Alvarez-Valin F., Jabbari K., Degrave W. M., Bernardi G. 2000; Gene expression, amino acid conservation, and hydrophobicity are the main factors shaping codon preferences in Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Mycobacterium leprae . J Mol Evol 50:45–55
   [Google Scholar]
6. Delcher A. L., Phillippy A., Carlton J., Salzberg S. L. 2002; Fast algorithms for large-scale genome alignment and comparison. Nucleic Acids Res 30:2478–2483
   [Google Scholar]
7. Dong H., Nilsson L., Kurland C. G. 1996; Co-variation of tRNA abundance and codon usage in Escherichia coli at different growth rates. J Mol Biol 260:649–663
   [Google Scholar]
8. Garcia-Vallve S., Romeu A., Palau J. 2000; Horizontal gene transfer of glycosyl hydrolases of the rumen fungi. Mol Biol Evol 17:352–361
   [Google Scholar]
9. Goncalves I., Robinson M., Perriere G., Mouchiroud D. 1999; jadis: computing distances between nucleic acid sequences. Bioinformatics 15:424–425
   [Google Scholar]
10. Gouy M., Gautier C. 1982; Codon usage in bacteria: correlation with gene expressivity. Nucleic Acids Res 10:7055–7074
    [Google Scholar]
11. Grantham R., Gautier C., Gouy M., Jacobzone M., Mercier R. 1981; Codon catalog usage is a genome strategy modulated for gene expressivity. Nucleic Acids Res 9:r43–74
    [Google Scholar]
12. Greenacre M. 1984 Theory and Applications of Correspondence Analysis London: Academic;
    [Google Scholar]
13. Grocock R. J., Sharp P. M. 2002; Synonymous codon usage in Pseudomonas aeruginosa PAO1. Gene 289:131–139
    [Google Scholar]
14. Ikemura T. 1981; Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes: a proposal for a synonymous codon choice that is optimal for the E. coli translational system. J Mol Biol 151:389–409
    [Google Scholar]
15. Kanaya S., Yamada Y., Kudo Y., Ikemura T. 1999; Studies of codon usage and tRNA genes of 18 unicellular organisms and quantification of Bacillus subtilis tRNAs: gene expression level and species-specific diversity of codon usage based on multivariate analysis. Gene 238:143–155
    [Google Scholar]
16. Karlin S. 2001; Detecting anomalous gene clusters and pathogenicity islands in diverse bacterial genomes. Trends Microbiol 9:335–343
    [Google Scholar]
17. Kerr A. R., Peden J. F., Sharp P. M. 1997; Systematic base composition variation around the genome of Mycoplasma genitalium , but not Mycoplasma pneumoniae . Mol Microbiol 25:1177–1179
    [Google Scholar]
18. Lafay B., Lloyd A. T., McLean M. J., Devine K. M., Sharp P. M., Wolfe K. H. 1999; Proteome composition and codon usage in spirochaetes: species-specific and DNA strand-specific mutational biases. Nucleic Acids Res 27:1642–1649
    [Google Scholar]
19. Lafay B., Atherton J. C., Sharp P. M. 2000; Absence of translationally selected synonymous codon usage bias in Helicobacter pylori . Microbiology 146:851–860
    [Google Scholar]
20. Li W. H. 1993; Unbiased estimation of the rates of synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution. J Mol Evol 36:96–99
    [Google Scholar]
21. Lobry J. R. 1996; Origin of replication of Mycoplasma genitalium . Science 272:745–746
    [Google Scholar]
22. McInerney J. O. 1997; Prokaryotic genome evolution as assessed by multivariate analysis of codon usage patterns. Microb Comp Genomics 2:1–10
    [Google Scholar]
23. McInerney J. O. 1998; Replicational and transcriptional selection on codon usage in Borrelia burgdorferi . Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:10698–10703
    [Google Scholar]
24. Musto H., Romero H., Zavala A., Jabbari K., Bernardi G. 1999; Synonymous codon choices in the extremely GC-poor genome of Plasmodium falciparum : compositional constraints and translational selection. J Mol Evol 49:27–35
    [Google Scholar]
25. Muto A., Osawa S. 1987; The guanine and cytosine content of genomic DNA and bacterial evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 84:166–169
    [Google Scholar]
26. Nei M., Gojobori T. 1986; Simple methods for estimating the numbers of synonymous and nonsynonymous nucleotide substitutions. Mol Biol Evol 3:418–426
    [Google Scholar]
27. Nolling J., Breton G., Omelchenko M. V. 16 other authors 2001; Genome sequence and comparative analysis of the solvent-producing bacterium Clostridium acetobutylicum . J Bacteriol 183:4823–4838
    [Google Scholar]
28. Percudani R., Pavesi A., Ottonello S. 1997; Transfer RNA gene redundancy and translational selection in Saccharomyces cerevisiae . J Mol Biol 268:322–330
    [Google Scholar]
29. Post L. E., Nomura M. 1979; Nucleotide sequence of the intercistronic region preceding the gene for RNA polymerase subunit alpha in Escherichia coli . J Biol Chem 254:10604–10606
    [Google Scholar]
30. Romero H., Zavala A., Musto H. 2000a; Codon usage in Chlamydia trachomatis is the result of strand-specific mutational biases and a complex pattern of selective forces. Nucleic Acids Res 28:2084–2090
    [Google Scholar]
31. Romero H., Zavala A., Musto H. 2000b; Compositional pressure and translational selection determine codon usage in the extremely GC-poor unicellular eukaryote Entamoeba histolytica . Gene 242:307–311
    [Google Scholar]
32. Sharp P. M., Li W. H. 1986; An evolutionary perspective on synonymous codon usage in unicellular organisms. J Mol Evol 24:28–38
    [Google Scholar]
33. Sharp P. M., Li W. H. 1987; The codon Adaptation Index: a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res 15:1281–1295
    [Google Scholar]
34. Sharp P. M., Tuohy T. M., Mosurski K. R. 1986; Codon usage in yeast: cluster analysis clearly differentiates highly and lowly expressed genes. Nucleic Acids Res 14:5125–5143
    [Google Scholar]
35. Shimizu T., Ohtani K., Hirakawa H. 7 other authors 2002; Complete genome sequence of Clostridium perfringens , an anaerobic flesh-eater. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 99:996–1001
    [Google Scholar]
36. Sueoka N. 1962; On the genetic basis of variation and heterogeneity of DNA base composition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 48:582–592
    [Google Scholar]
37. Thompson J. D., Higgins D. G., Gibson T. J. 1994; clustal w: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res 22:4673–4680
    [Google Scholar]
38. Zavala A., Naya H., Romero H., Musto H. 2002; Trends in codon and amino acid usage in Thermotoga maritima . J Mol Evol 54:563–568
    [Google Scholar]