1887

Abstract

SUMMARY: In the preparation of taxonomic data for computer analysis, some new methods are proposed which compensate for certain inadequacies in present techniques without violating the essential Adansonian axiom that all properties of organisms are of equal significance in the creation of taxa. A modified scoring technique is presented for use with tests wherein two or more alternative responses (none necessarily negative) are possible. The proposed method might well be extended to the scoring of all data; one is never sure of the significance of a ‘negative’ result, and it could be considered that at least two alternatives of equal value in classification may exist for any determinable property of an organism. It is suggested that computed relationships among organisms might better be expressed in terms of , which is a logarithmic function of the ratio in current use. A new diagnostic parameter, , is defined as a quantitative estimate of the proportion of organisms in any group (taxon) which possess a given property. Computer programs based on such values could be devised for diagnosis of organisms whose identitv is unknown.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-28-4-633
1962-09-01
2024-04-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/28/4/mic-28-4-633.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-28-4-633&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Beers R. J., Fisher J., Megraw S., Lockhart W. R. 1962; A comparison of methods for computer taxonomy. J. gen. Microbiol. 28:641
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Bojalil L. F., Cerbón J. 1961; Taxonomic analysis of non-pigmented, rapidly growing mycobacteria. J. Bact. 81:338
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Colwell R. R., Liston J. 1961; Taxonomic relationships among the pseudomonads. J. Bact. 82:1
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Finney D. J., Hazlewood T., Smith M. J. 1955; Logarithms to base 2. J. gen. Microbiol. 12:222
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Gilardi E., Hill L. R., Turri M., Silvestri L. G. 1960; Quantitative methods in the systematics of Actinomycetales. I. G. Microbiol. 8:203
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Hill L. R. 1959; The Adansonian classification of the staphylococci. J. gen. Microbiol. 20:277
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Hill L. R., Turri M., Gilardi E., Silvestri L. G. 1961; Quantitative methods in the systematics of Actinomycetales. II. G. Microbiol. 9:56
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Lysenko O., Sneath P. H. A. 1959; The use of models in bacterial classification. J. gen. Microbiol. 20:284
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Rogers D. J., Tanimoto T. T. 1960; A computer program for classifying plants. Science 132:1115
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Sneath P. H. A. 1957a; Some thoughts on bacterial classification. J. gen. Microbiol. 17:184
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Sneath P. H. A. 1957b; The application of computers to taxonomy. J. gen. Microbiol. 17:201
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Sneath P. H. A., Cowan S. T. 1958; An electrotaxonomic survey of bacteria. J. gen. Microbiol. 19:551
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Talbot J. M., Sneath P. H. A. 1960; A taxonomic study of Pasteurella septica, especially of strains isolated from human sources. J. gen. Microbiol. 22:303
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-28-4-633
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/00221287-28-4-633
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error