1887

Abstract

The alarmone (p)ppGpp mediates the stringent response and has a recognized role in bacterial virulence. We previously reported a stringent response-like state in Enterococcus faecalis isolated from a rabbit foreign body abscess model and showed that E. faecalis mutants with varying levels of cellular (p)ppGpp [Δrel, ΔrelQ and the (p)ppGpp ΔrelΔrelQ] had differential abilities to persist within abscesses. In this study, we investigated whether (p)ppGpp contributes to the pathogenesis of E. faecalis infective endocarditis (IE), a biofilm infection of the heart valves. While the stringent response was not activated in heart valve-associated E. faecalis, deletion of the gene encoding the bifunctional (p)ppGpp synthetase/hydrolase Rel significantly impaired valve colonization. These results indicate that the presence of (p)ppGpp is dispensable for E. faecalis to cause IE, whereas the ability to regulate (p)ppGpp levels is critical for valve colonization. Next, we characterized how basal (p)ppGpp levels affect processes associated with IE pathogenesis. Despite being defective in binding to BSA-coated polystyrene surfaces, the Δrel strain bound to collagen- and fibronectin-coated surfaces and ex vivo porcine heart valves as well as the parent and ΔrelΔrelQ strains, ruling out the possibility that the impaired IE phenotype was due to an attachment defect. Moreover, differences in cellular (p)ppGpp levels did not affect extracellular gelatinase activity but significantly impaired enterococcal invasion of human coronary artery endothelial cells. Taken together, this study uncovers for the first time the fact that differences in basal (p)ppGpp levels, rather than the stringent response, differentially affect processes that contribute to the pathogenesis of IE.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.000703
2018-08-09
2024-03-28
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/164/10/1254.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.000703&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Toyoda N, Chikwe J, Itagaki S, Gelijns AC, Adams DH et al. Trends in infective endocarditis in California and New York State, 1998–2013. JAMA 2017; 317:1652–1660 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Ambrosioni J, Hernandez-Meneses M, Téllez A, Pericàs J, Falces C et al. The changing epidemiology of infective endocarditis in the twenty-first century. Curr Infect Dis Rep 2017; 19:21 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Bashore TM, Cabell C, Fowler V. Update on infective endocarditis. Curr Probl Cardiol 2006; 31:274–352 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Donlan RM, Costerton JW. Biofilms: survival mechanisms of clinically relevant microorganisms. Clin Microbiol Rev 2002; 15:167–193 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Durack DT. Experimental bacterial endocarditis. IV. Structure and evolution of very early lesions. J Pathol 1975; 115:81–89 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Baddour LM, Wilson WR, Bayer AS, Fowler VG, Tleyjeh IM et al. Infective endocarditis in adults: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a scientific statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2015; 132:1435–1486 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Murdoch DR, Corey GR, Hoen B, Miró JM, Fowler VG et al. Clinical presentation, etiology, and outcome of infective endocarditis in the 21st century: the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-prospective cohort study. Arch Intern Med 2009; 169:463–473 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Chirouze C, Athan E, Alla F, Chu VH, Ralph Corey G et al. Enterococcal endocarditis in the beginning of the 21st century: analysis from the International Collaboration on Endocarditis-prospective cohort study. Clin Microbiol Infect 2013; 19:1140–1147 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Rozdzinski E, Marre R, Susa M, Wirth R, Muscholl-Silberhorn A. Aggregation substance-mediated adherence of Enterococcus faecalis to immobilized extracellular matrix proteins. Microb Pathog 2001; 30:211–220 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Nallapareddy SR, Singh KV, Sillanpää J, Zhao M, Murray BE. Relative contributions of Ebp pili and the collagen adhesin Ace to host extracellular matrix protein adherence and experimental urinary tract infection by Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF. Infect Immun 2011; 79:2901–2910 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Nallapareddy SR, Murray BE. Ligand-signaled upregulation of Enterococcus faecalis ace transcription, a mechanism for modulating host-E. faecalis interaction. Infect Immun 2006; 74:4982–4989 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Singh KV, La Rosa SL, Somarajan SR, Roh JH, Murray BE. The fibronectin-binding protein EfbA contributes to pathogenesis and protects against infective endocarditis caused by Enterococcus faecalis. Infect Immun 2015; 83:4487–4494 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Rasmussen M, Johansson D, Söbirk SK, Mörgelin M, Shannon O. Clinical isolates of Enterococcus faecalis aggregate human platelets. Microbes Infect 2010; 12:295–301 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Nallapareddy SR, Sillanpää J, Mitchell J, Singh KV, Chowdhury SA et al. Conservation of Ebp-type pilus genes among enterococci and demonstration of their role in adherence of Enterococcus faecalis to human platelets. Infect Immun 2011; 79:2911–2920 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Thurlow LR, Thomas VC, Narayanan S, Olson S, Fleming SD et al. Gelatinase contributes to the pathogenesis of endocarditis caused by Enterococcus faecalis. Infect Immun 2010; 78:4936–4943 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Waters CM, Antiporta MH, Murray BE, Dunny GM. Role of the Enterococcus faecalis GelE protease in determination of cellular chain length, supernatant pheromone levels, and degradation of fibrin and misfolded surface proteins. J Bacteriol 2003; 185:3613–3623 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Nallapareddy SR, Singh KV, Sillanpää J, Garsin DA, Höök M et al. Endocarditis and biofilm-associated pili of Enterococcus faecalis. J Clin Invest 2006; 116:2799–2807 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Singh KV, Nallapareddy SR, Sillanpää J, Murray BE. Importance of the collagen adhesin Ace in pathogenesis and protection against Enterococcus faecalis experimental endocarditis. PLoS Pathog 2010; 6:e1000716 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Qin X, Singh KV, Weinstock GM, Murray BE. Characterization of fsr, a regulator controlling expression of gelatinase and serine protease in Enterococcus faecalis OG1RF. J Bacteriol 2001; 183:3372–3382 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Sievert DM, Ricks P, Edwards JR, Schneider A, Patel J et al. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2009–2010. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2013; 34:1–14 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Abranches J, Martinez AR, Kajfasz JK, Chávez V, Garsin DA et al. The molecular alarmone (p)ppGpp mediates stress responses, vancomycin tolerance, and virulence in Enterococcus faecalis. J Bacteriol 2009; 191:2248–2256 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Gaca AO, Kajfasz JK, Miller JH, Liu K, Wang JD et al. Basal levels of (p)ppGpp in Enterococcus faecalis: the magic beyond the stringent response. MBio 2013; 4:e00646-13 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Chávez de Paz LE, Lemos JA, Wickström C, Sedgley CM. Role of (p)ppGpp in biofilm formation by Enterococcus faecalis. Appl Environ Microbiol 2012; 78:1627–1630 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Colomer-Winter C, Gaca AO, Lemos JA. Association of metal homeostasis and (p)ppGpp regulation in the pathophysiology of Enterococcus faecalis. Infect Immun 2017; 85:e00260-17 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Potrykus K, Cashel M. (p)ppGpp: still magical?. Annu Rev Microbiol 2008; 62:35–51 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Gaca AO, Colomer-Winter C, Lemos JA. Many means to a common end: the intricacies of (p)ppGpp metabolism and its control of bacterial homeostasis. J Bacteriol 2015; 197:1146–1156 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Dalebroux ZD, Svensson SL, Gaynor EC, Swanson MS. ppGpp conjures bacterial virulence. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 2010; 74:171–199 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. Yan X, Zhao C, Budin-Verneuil A, Hartke A, Rincé A et al. The (p)ppGpp synthetase RelA contributes to stress adaptation and virulence in Enterococcus faecalis V583. Microbiology 2009; 155:3226–3237 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Gaca AO, Abranches J, Kajfasz JK, Lemos JA. Global transcriptional analysis of the stringent response in Enterococcus faecalis. Microbiology 2012; 158:1994–2004 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Frank KL, Colomer-Winter C, Grindle SM, Lemos JA, Schlievert PM et al. Transcriptome analysis of Enterococcus faecalis during mammalian infection shows cells undergo adaptation and exist in a stringent response state. PLoS One 2014; 9:e115839 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Dunny GM, Brown BL, Clewell DB. Induced cell aggregation and mating in Streptococcus faecalis: evidence for a bacterial sex pheromone. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1978; 75:3479–3483 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Roggiani M, Schlievert PM. Purification of streptococcal pyrogenic exotoxin A. In Evans TJ. (editor) Septic Shock Methods and Protocols (Methods in Molecular Medicine Series vol. 36) Totowa, NJ: Humana Press; 2000 pp. 59–66
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Chuang ON, Schlievert PM, Wells CL, Manias DA, Tripp TJ et al. Multiple functional domains of Enterococcus faecalis aggregation substance Asc10 contribute to endocarditis virulence. Infect Immun 2009; 77:539–548 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Frank KL, Barnes AM, Grindle SM, Manias DA, Schlievert PM et al. Use of recombinase-based in vivo expression technology to characterize Enterococcus faecalis gene expression during infection identifies in vivo-expressed antisense RNAs and implicates the protease Eep in pathogenesis. Infect Immun 2012; 80:539–549 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Frank KL, Guiton PS, Barnes AM, Manias DA, Chuang-Smith ON et al. AhrC and Eep are biofilm infection-associated virulence factors in Enterococcus faecalis. Infect Immun 2013; 81:1696–1708 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. Pfaffl MW. A new mathematical model for relative quantification in real-time RT-PCR. Nucleic Acids Res 2001; 29:e45 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Leuck AM, Johnson JR, Dunny GM. A widely used in vitro biofilm assay has questionable clinical significance for enterococcal endocarditis. PLoS One 2014; 9:e107282 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Abranches J, Zeng L, Bélanger M, Rodrigues PH, Simpson-Haidaris PJ et al. Invasion of human coronary artery endothelial cells by Streptococcus mutans OMZ175. Oral Microbiol Immunol 2009; 24:141–145 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Avilés-Reyes A, Miller JH, Simpson-Haidaris PJ, Lemos JA, Abranches J. Cnm is a major virulence factor of invasive Streptococcus mutans and part of a conserved three-gene locus. Mol Oral Microbiol 2014; 29:11–23 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Montville TJ. Dual-substrate plate diffusion assay for proteases. Appl Environ Microbiol 1983; 45:200–204[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods 2012; 9:671–675 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Motulsky HJ, Brown RE. Detecting outliers when fitting data with nonlinear regression – a new method based on robust nonlinear regression and the false discovery rate. BMC Bioinformatics 2006; 7:123 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Potrykus K, Murphy H, Philippe N, Cashel M. ppGpp is the major source of growth rate control in E. coli. Environ Microbiol 2011; 13:563–575 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Hernandez VJ, Bremer H. Characterization of RNA and DNA synthesis in Escherichia coli strains devoid of ppGpp. J Biol Chem 1993; 268:10851–10862[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Traxler MF, Summers SM, Nguyen HT, Zacharia VM, Hightower GA et al. The global, ppGpp-mediated stringent response to amino acid starvation in Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol 2008; 68:1128–1148 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Chuang-Smith ON, Wells CL, Henry-Stanley MJ, Dunny GM. Acceleration of Enterococcus faecalis biofilm formation by aggregation substance expression in an ex vivo model of cardiac valve colonization. PLoS One 2010; 5:e15798 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Cashel M, Kalbacher B. The control of ribonucleic acid synthesis in Escherichia coli. V. Characterization of a nucleotide associated with the stringent response. J Biol Chem 1970; 245:2309–2327[PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Cashel M, Gallant J. Two compounds implicated in the function of the RC gene of Escherichia coli. Nature 1969; 221:838–841 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Kazmierczak KM, Wayne KJ, Rechtsteiner A, Winkler ME. Roles of rel(Spn) in stringent response, global regulation and virulence of serotype 2 Streptococcus pneumoniae D39. Mol Microbiol 2009; 72:590–611 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Taylor CM, Beresford M, Epton HA, Sigee DC, Shama G et al. Listeria monocytogenes relA and hpt mutants are impaired in surface-attached growth and virulence. J Bacteriol 2002; 184:621–628 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Geiger T, Goerke C, Fritz M, Schäfer T, Ohlsen K et al. Role of the (p)ppGpp synthase RSH, a RelA/SpoT homolog, in stringent response and virulence of Staphylococcus aureus. Infect Immun 2010; 78:1873–1883 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Kaplan JB. Biofilm dispersal: mechanisms, clinical implications, and potential therapeutic uses. J Dent Res 2010; 89:205–218 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Park SY, Kim KM, Lee JH, Seo SJ, Lee IH. Extracellular gelatinase of Enterococcus faecalis destroys a defense system in insect hemolymph and human serum. Infect Immun 2007; 75:1861–1869 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Steck N, Hoffmann M, Sava IG, Kim SC, Hahne H et al. Enterococcus faecalis metalloprotease compromises epithelial barrier and contributes to intestinal inflammation. Gastroenterology 2011; 141:959–971 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Maharshak N, Huh EY, Paiboonrungruang C, Shanahan M, Thurlow L et al. Enterococcus faecalis gelatinase mediates intestinal permeability via protease-activated receptor 2. Infect Immun 2015; 83:2762–2770 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Manias DA, Dunny GM. Expression of adhesive pili and the collagen-binding adhesin Ace is activated by ArgR family transcription factors in Enterococcus faecalis. J Bacteriol 2018JB.00269-18 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Gao P, Pinkston KL, Nallapareddy SR, van Hoof A, Murray BE et al. Enterococcus faecalis rnjB is required for pilin gene expression and biofilm formation. J Bacteriol 2010; 192:5489–5498 [View Article][PubMed]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.000703
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.000703
Loading

Data & Media loading...

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error