1887

Abstract

Annexins are multifunctional proteins that bind to phospholipid membranes in a calcium-dependent manner. Annexins play a myriad of critical and well-characterized roles in mammals, ranging from membrane repair to vesicular secretion. The role of annexins in the kingdoms of bacteria, protozoa and fungi have been largely overlooked. The fact that there is no known homologue of annexins in the yeast model organism may contribute to this gap in knowledge. However, annexins are found in most medically important fungal pathogens, with the notable exception of . In this study we evaluated the function of the one annexin gene in , a causative agent of cryptococcosis. This gene CNAG_02415, is annotated in the genome as a target of calcineurin through its transcription factor Crz1, and we propose to update its name to cryptococcal annexin, AnnexinC1. strains deleted for AnnexinC1 revealed no difference in survival after exposure to various chemical stressors relative to wild-type strain, as well as no major alteration in virulence or mating. The only alteration observed in strains deleted for AnnexinC1 was a small increase in the titan cells' formation . The preservation of annexins in many different fungal species suggests an important function, and therefore the lack of a strong phenotype for annexin-deficient indicates either the presence of redundant genes that can compensate for the absence of AnnexinC1 function or novel functions not revealed by standard assays of cell function and pathogenicity.

Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.000815
2019-08-01
2024-04-19
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/micro/165/8/852.html?itemId=/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.000815&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

References

  1. Gerke V, Moss SE. Annexins: from structure to function. Physiol Rev 2002; 82:331–371 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  2. Clark GB, Morgan RO, Fernandez MP, Roux SJ. Evolutionary adaptation of plant annexins has diversified their molecular structures, interactions and functional roles. New Phytol 2012; 196:695–712 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  3. Davies JM. Annexin-mediated calcium signalling in plants. Plants 2014; 3:128–140 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  4. Zhang F, Li S, Yang S, Wang L, Guo W. Overexpression of a cotton annexin gene, GhAnn1, enhances drought and salt stress tolerance in transgenic cotton. Plant Mol Biol 2015; 87:47–67 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  5. Li R, Tan S, Yu M, Jundt MC, Zhang S et al. Annexin A2 regulates autophagy in Pseudomonas aeruginosa infection through the Akt1-mTOR-ULK1/2 signaling pathway. J Immunol 2015; 195:3901–3911 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  6. Stukes S, Coelho C, Rivera J, Jedlicka AE, Hajjar KA et al. The membrane phospholipid binding protein annexin A2 promotes phagocytosis and nonlytic exocytosis of Cryptococcus neoformans and impacts survival in fungal infection. J Immunol 2016; 197:1252–1261 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  7. Vanessa KHQ, Julia MG, Wenwei L, Michelle ALT, Zarina ZRS et al. Absence of annexin A1 impairs host adaptive immunity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in vivo. Immunobiology 2015; 220:614–623 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  8. Jenikova G, Hruz P, Andersson MK, Tejman-Yarden N, Ferreira PCD et al. A1-giardin based live heterologous vaccine protects against Giardia lamblia infection in a murine model. Vaccine 2011; 29:9529–9537 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  9. Kodavali PK, Dudkiewicz M, Pikuła S, Pawłowski K. Bioinformatics analysis of bacterial annexins-putative ancestral relatives of eukaryotic annexins. PLoS One 2014; 9:e85428 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  10. Cantacessi C, Seddon JM, Miller TL, Leow CY, Thomas L et al. A genome-wide analysis of annexins from parasitic organisms and their vectors. Sci Rep 2013; 3:2893 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  11. Weeratunga SK, Osman A, Hu N-J, Wang CK, Mason L et al. Alpha-1 giardin is an annexin with highly unusual calcium-regulated mechanisms. J Mol Biol 2012; 423:169–181 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  12. Dunlap JC, Borkovich KA, Henn MR, Turner GE, Sachs MS et al. Enabling a community to dissect an organism: overview of the Neurospora functional genomics project. Adv Genet 2007; 57:49–96 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  13. Khalaj K, Aminollahi E, Bordbar A, Khalaj V. Fungal annexins: a mini review. Springerplus 2015; 4:721 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  14. Khalaj V, Azarian B, Enayati S, Vaziri B. Annexin C4 in A. fumigatus: a proteomics approach to understand the function. J Proteomics 2011; 74:1950–1958 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  15. Khalaj V, Smith L, Brookman J, Tuckwell D. Identification of a novel class of annexin genes. FEBS Lett 2004b; 562:79–86 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  16. Khalaj V, Hey P, Smith L, Robson GD, Brookman J. The Aspergillus niger annexin, anxC3.1 is constitutively expressed and is not essential for protein secretion. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2004a; 239:163–169 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  17. Xie XL, Yang H, Chen LN, Wei Y, Zhang SH. ANXC7 is a Mitochondrion-Localized annexin involved in controlling Conidium development and oxidative resistance in the thermophilic fungus Thermomyces lanuginosus . Front Microbiol 2018; 9:864 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  18. Braun EL, Kang S, Nelson MA, Natvig DO. Identification of the first fungal annexin: analysis of annexin gene duplications and implications for eukaryotic evolution. J Mol Evol 1998; 47:531–543 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  19. Rajasingham R, Smith RM, Park BJ, Jarvis JN, Govender NP et al. Global burden of disease of HIV-associated cryptococcal meningitis: an updated analysis. Lancet Infect Dis 2017; 17:873–881 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  20. Brown JCS, Nelson J, VanderSluis B, Deshpande R, Butts A et al. Unraveling the biology of a fungal meningitis pathogen using chemical genetics. Cell 2014; 159:1168–1187 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  21. Lev S, Desmarini D, Chayakulkeeree M, Sorrell TC, Djordjevic JT. The Crz1/Sp1 transcription factor of Cryptococcus neoformans is activated by calcineurin and regulates cell wall integrity. PLoS One 2012; 7:e51403 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  22. Park H-S, Chow EWL, Fu C, Soderblom EJ, Moseley MA et al. Calcineurin targets involved in stress survival and fungal virulence. PLoS Pathog 2016; 12:e1005873 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  23. Chow EWL, Clancey SA, Billmyre RB, Averette AF, Granek JA et al. Elucidation of the calcineurin-Crz1 stress response transcriptional network in the human fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans . PLoS Genet 2017; 13:e1006667 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  24. Steinbach WJ, Reedy JL, Cramer RA, Perfect JR, Heitman J. Harnessing calcineurin as a novel anti-infective agent against invasive fungal infections. Nat Rev Micro 2007; 5:418–430 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  25. Derengowski LdaS, Paes HC, Albuquerque P, Tavares AH, Fernandes L et al. The transcriptional response of Cryptococcus neoformans to ingestion by Acanthamoeba castellanii and macrophages provides insights into the evolutionary adaptation to the mammalian host. Eukaryot Cell 2013; 12:761–774 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  26. Geddes JMH, Croll D, Caza M, Stoynov N, Foster LJ et al. Secretome profiling of Cryptococcus neoformans reveals regulation of a subset of virulence-associated proteins and potential biomarkers by protein kinase A. BMC Microbiol 2015; 15:206 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  27. Rodrigues ML, Nakayasu ES, Oliveira DL, Nimrichter L, Nosanchuk JD et al. Extracellular vesicles produced by Cryptococcus neoformans contain protein components associated with virulence. Eukaryot Cell 2008; 7:58–67 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  28. O'Meara TR, Holmer SM, Selvig K, Dietrich F, Alspaugh JA. Cryptococcus neoformans Rim101 is associated with cell wall remodeling and evasion of the host immune responses. MBio 2013; 4:e00522-12 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  29. Marchler-Bauer A, Bo Y, Han L, He J, Lanczycki CJ et al. CDD/SPARCLE: functional classification of proteins via subfamily domain architectures. Nucleic Acids Res 2017; 45:D200–D203 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  30. Edgar RC. Muscle: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res 2004b; 32:1792–1797 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  31. Benkert P, Biasini M, Schwede T. Toward the estimation of the absolute quality of individual protein structure models. Bioinformatics 2011; 27:343–350 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  32. Biasini M, Bienert S, Waterhouse A, Arnold K, Studer G et al. SWISS-MODEL: modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information. Nucleic Acids Res 2014; 42:W252–W258 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  33. Basenko E, Pulman J, Shanmugasundram A, Harb O, Crouch K et al. FungiDB: an integrated bioinformatic resource for fungi and Oomycetes. J Fungi 2018; 4:39 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  34. Janbon G, Ormerod KL, Paulet D, Byrnes EJ, Yadav V et al. Analysis of the genome and transcriptome of Cryptococcus neoformans var. grubii reveals complex RNA expression and microevolution leading to virulence attenuation. PLoS Genet 2014; 10:e1004261 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  35. Liu OW, Chun CD, Chow ED, Chen C, Madhani HD et al. Systematic genetic analysis of virulence in the human fungal pathogen Cryptococcus neoformans . Cell 2008; 135:174–188 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  36. McClelland EE, Ramagopal UA, Rivera J, Cox J, Nakouzi A et al. A small protein associated with fungal energy metabolism affects the virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans in mammals. PLoS Pathog 2016; 12:e1005849 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  37. Kim MS, Kim SY, Jung KW, Bahn YS. Targeted gene disruption in Cryptococcus neoformans using double-joint PCR with split dominant selectable markers. Methods Mol Biol 2012; 845:67-84 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  38. Kent CR, Ortiz-Bermúdez P, Giles SS, Hull CM. Formulation of a defined V8 medium for induction of sexual development of Cryptococcus neoformans . Appl Environ Microbiol 2008; 74:6248–6253 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  39. Alexander BD. Reference Method for Broth Dilution Antifungal Susceptibility Testing of Yeasts, 4 edn. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute; 2017
    [Google Scholar]
  40. Damiani G, Kiyotaki C, Soeller W, Sasada M, Peisach J et al. Macrophage variants in oxygen metabolism. J Exp Med 1980; 152:808–822 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  41. Casadevall A, Cleare W, Feldmesser M, Glatman-Freedman A, Goldman DL et al. Characterization of a murine monoclonal antibody to Cryptococcus neoformans polysaccharide that is a candidate for human therapeutic studies. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 1998; 42:1437–1446 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  42. Welch AZ, Koshland DE. A simple colony-formation assay in liquid medium, termed 'tadpoling', provides a sensitive measure of Saccharomyces cerevisiae culture viability. Yeast 2013; 30:501–509 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  43. Fu MS, Casadevall A. Divalent metal cations potentiate the predatory capacity of amoeba for Cryptococcus neoformans . Appl Environ Microbiol 2018; 84:
    [Google Scholar]
  44. Hommel B, Mukaremera L, Cordero RJB, Coelho C, Desjardins CA et al. Titan cells formation in Cryptococcus neoformans is finely tuned by environmental conditions and modulated by positive and negative genetic regulators. PLoS Pathog 2018; 14:e1006982 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  45. Bouklas T, Diago-Navarro E, Wang X, Fenster M, Fries BC. Characterization of the virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans strains in an insect model. Virulence 2015; 6:809–813 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  46. Eisenman HC, Duong R, Chan H, Tsue R, McClelland EE. Reduced virulence of melanized Cryptococcus neoformans in Galleria mellonella . Virulence 2014; 5:611–618 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  47. Mylonakis E, Moreno R, El Khoury JB, Idnurm A, Heitman J et al. Galleria mellonella as a model system to study Cryptococcus neoformans pathogenesis. Infect Immun 2005; 73:3842–3850 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  48. Trevijano-Contador N, Herrero-Fernández I, García-Barbazán I, Scorzoni L, Rueda C et al. Cryptococcus neoformans induces antimicrobial responses and behaves as a facultative intracellular pathogen in the non mammalian model Galleria mellonella . Virulence 2015; 6:66–74 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  49. Rivera J, Mukherjee J, Weiss LM, Casadevall A. Antibody efficacy in murine pulmonary Cryptococcus neoformans infection: a role for nitric oxide. J Immunol 2002; 168:3419–3427 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  50. Inglis DO, Skrzypek MS, Liaw E, Moktali V, Sherlock G et al. Literature-based gene curation and proposed genetic nomenclature for Cryptococcus . Eukaryot Cell 2014; 13:878–883 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  51. Morgan RO, Martin-Almedina S, Iglesias JM, Gonzalez-Florez MI, Fernandez MP. Evolutionary perspective on annexin calcium-binding domains. Biochim Biophys Acta 2004; 1742:133–140 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  52. Mortimer JC, Laohavisit A, Macpherson N, Webb A, Brownlee C et al. Annexins: multifunctional components of growth and adaptation. J Exp Bot 2008; 59:533–544 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  53. Le SQ, Gascuel O. An improved general amino acid replacement matrix. Mol Biol Evol 2008; 25:1307–1320 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  54. Kumar S, Stecher G, Tamura K. MEGA7: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis version 7.0 for bigger datasets. Mol Biol Evol 2016; 33:1870–1874 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  55. Chen YL, Lehman VN, Lewit Y, Averette AF, Heitman J. Calcineurin governs thermotolerance and virulence of Cryptococcus gattii . G3 2013; 3:527–539 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  56. Arras SDM, Chitty JL, Blake KL, Schulz BL, Fraser JA. A genomic safe haven for mutant complementation in Cryptococcus neoformans . PLoS One 2015; 10:e0122916 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  57. Magditch DA, Liu TB, Xue C, Idnurm A. DNA mutations mediate microevolution between host-adapted forms of the pathogenic fungus Cryptococcus neoformans . PLoS Pathog 2012; 8:e1002936 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  58. Vu K, Bautos JM, Gelli A. The Cch1-Mid1 high-affinity calcium channel contributes to the virulence of Cryptococcus neoformans by mitigating oxidative stress. Eukaryot Cell 2015; 14:1135–1143 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  59. Dambuza IM, Drake T, Chapuis A, Zhou X, Correia J et al. The Cryptococcus neoformans titan cell is an inducible and regulated morphotype underlying pathogenesis. PLoS Pathog 2018; 14:e1006978 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  60. Trevijano-Contador N, de Oliveira HC, García-Rodas R, Rossi SA, Llorente I et al. Cryptococcus neoformans can form titan-like cells in vitro in response to multiple signals. PLoS Pathog 2018; 14:e1007007 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  61. Pervin MS, Itoh G, Talukder MSU, Fujimoto K, Morimoto YV et al. A study of wound repair in Dictyostelium cells by using novel laserporation. Sci Rep 2018; 8:7969 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  62. Turner GE. Phenotypic analysis of Neurospora crassa gene deletion strains. Methods Mol Biol 2011; 722:191–198 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
  63. Kelliher CM, Leman AR, Sierra CS, Haase SB. Investigating conservation of the cell-cycle-regulated transcriptional program in the fungal pathogen, Cryptococcus neoformans . PLoS Genet 2016; 12:e1006453 [View Article]
    [Google Scholar]
http://instance.metastore.ingenta.com/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.000815
Loading
/content/journal/micro/10.1099/mic.0.000815
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplements

Supplementary material 1

PDF
This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error