Permeability of Phenyl-Hg+-resistant and Phenyl-Hg+-susceptible Isolates of Pyrenophora avenae to the Phenyl-Hg+ Ion

References

1. Boyer P. D. 1961 In The Enzymes, vol. 1 chap. 11. Edited by Boyer P. D., Lardy H., and Myrback K. London & New York: Academic Press;
   [Google Scholar]
2. Crosier W. F., Waters E. C., Crosier D. C. 1970; Development of tolerance to organic mercurials of Pyrenophora avenae . Plant Disease Reporter 54:783–785
   [Google Scholar]
3. Dekker J. 1969; Acquired resistance to fungicides. World Review of Pest Control 8:79–85
   [Google Scholar]
4. Dorne B., Hirth L. 1969; Studies on the interaction of mercuric ions with Tomato Bushy Stunt Virus. Biochemistry 9:119–125
   [Google Scholar]
5. Gershon H., Kilroy W. P., Schulman S. G. 1971; Reinterpretation of the apparent fungitoxicity of bis (5,7-dichloro-8-quinolinolato) copper(II) at low pH values. Implications of the fungal spore wall as a barrier against potential antifungal agents. Contributions from the Boyce Thompson Institute 24:351–355
   [Google Scholar]
6. Gershon H., McNeil M. W., Hinds Y. 1969; 5 nitro-8-quinolinols and their copper II complexes. Implications of the fungal spore wall as a possible barrier against potential antifungal agents. Journal of Medical Chemistry 12:1115–1117
   [Google Scholar]
7. Greenaway W. 1971; Relationship between mercury resistance and pigment production in Pyrenophora avenae . Transactions of the British Mycological Society 56:37–44
   [Google Scholar]
8. Greenaway W., Cowan J. W. 1970; The stability of mercury resistance in Pyrenophora avenae . Transactions of the British Mycological Society 54:127–138
   [Google Scholar]
9. Hughes W. L. 1957; A physiochemical rationale for the biological activity of mercury and its compounds. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 65:454–460
   [Google Scholar]
10. Johnson W. C. 1964 Organic Reagents for Metals and Certain Radicals, vol. 2 pp. 93–110 Chadwell Heath: Hopkin & Williams;
    [Google Scholar]
11. McMurray C. H., Trentham D. R. 1969; A new class of chromophoric organo-mercurials and their reactions with d-glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Biochemical Journal 115:913–921
    [Google Scholar]
12. Magnus H. A. 1970; Mercury tolerance in Pyrenophora avenae in Norway. Meldinger fra Norges Land-brukshøgskole 49:1–8
    [Google Scholar]
13. Malone J. P. 1968; Mercury resistant Pyrenophora avenae in N. Ireland seed oats. Plant Pathology 17:41–45
    [Google Scholar]
14. Noble M., MacGarvie Q. D., Hams A. F., Leaf E. L. 1966; Resistance to mercury of Pyrenophora avenae in Scottish seed oats. Plant Pathology 15:23–28
    [Google Scholar]
15. Old K. M. 1968; Mercury tolerant Pyrenophora avenae in seed oats. Transactions of the British Mycological Society 51:525–534
    [Google Scholar]
16. Pitt D. 1969; Cytochemical observations on the localization of sulphydryl groups in budding yeast cells and in the phialides of Penicillium notatum Westling during conidiation. Journal of General Microbiology 59:257–262
    [Google Scholar]
17. Robson J. E., Stockley H. M. 1962; Sulphydryl metabolism of fungi grown in submerged culture. Journal of General Microbiology 28:57–68
    [Google Scholar]
18. Rothstein A. 1959; Cell membrane as site of action of heavy metals. Federation Proceedings 18:1026–1035
    [Google Scholar]
19. Sheridan J. E., Tickle J. K., Chin Y. S. 1968; Resistance to mercury of Pyrenophora avenae (conidial state Helminthosporium avenae) in New Zealand seed oats. New Zealand Journal of Agricultural Research 11:601–606
    [Google Scholar]
20. Tarbell D. S. 1961 In Organic Sulphur Compounds, chap. 10. Edited by Kharasch N. Oxford: Pergamon Press;
    [Google Scholar]
21. Webb J. L. 1966 Enzyme and Metabolic Inhibitors, vol. 2 chap. 7. London & New York: Academic Press;
    [Google Scholar]